🔗 Share this article

Imagine this: a happy the Danish striker in a Napoli shirt. Next, place it with a sad-looking the Slovenian forward in a Manchester United kit, appearing like he just missed an open goal. Don't bother locating an actual photo of that miss; context is the enemy. Then, include some goal stats in a big, silly font. Remember the emojis. Share it across all platforms.

Will you mention that Højlund's tally includes strikes in the premier European competition while Sesko does not compete in Europe? Of course not. And will you highlight that several of Højlund's goals came against weaker national sides, or that his national team is far superior to Sesko's Slovenia and creates far more scoring opportunities. If you run online for a large outlet, pure interaction is your livelihood, United are the biggest draw, and nuance is the thing to avoid.

Thus the wheel of content turns. The next job is to sift through a lengthy interview with Peter Schmeichel and extract the part where he calls the acquisition of Sesko "strange". There's a bit, where Schmeichel qualifies his comments by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, remove that part. Nobody wants that. Simply make sure "weird" and "Sesko" appear together in the title. People will be outraged.

This Time of Potential and Hasty Opinions

Mid-autumn has long been one of my preferred periods to watch football. Leaves fall, the wind turns, squads and strategies are newly formed, all is novel and yet patterns are emerging. The stars of the coming months are planting their flags. The transfer window is closed. Nobody is mentioning the quadruple yet. All teams are in contention. At this precise point, all is possibility.

Yet, for similar reasons, this period has also been one of my most disliked times to consume news on football. Because although no outcomes are decided, opinions must be formed immediately. The City winger is resurgent. Florian Wirtz has been a crushing disappointment. Could Semenyo be the best player in the league right now? We need a decision immediately.

The Player as The Prime Example

In many ways, Sesko feels like the archetype in this respect, a player inextricably trapped between football's two countervailing, unavoidable forces. The need to delay definitive judgment, to let layers of technical texture and strategic understanding to mature. And the demand to produce permanent verdicts, a constant stream of opinions and memes, out-of-context criticisms and pointless comparisons, a square that can not truly be circled.

I do not propose to provide a in-depth evaluation of Sesko's stint at Manchester United so far. He has been in the lineup four times in the top flight in a wildly inconsistent team, found the net twice, and taken a grand total of 116 touches. What exactly are we evaluating? And will I attempt to replicate the pundits' notable debate "The Sesko Debate", in which two famous analysts duel thrillingly on a popular show over whether Sesko needs 10 goals to be a success this year (Neville), or whether it is more like twelve or thirteen (the other).

A Cruel Environment

For all this I loved watching Sesko at Leipzig: a big, screeching sports car of a forward, playing in a team ideally suited to his talents: given the freedom to rampage but also the freedom to miss. Partly this is why United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "brutal verdicts" are summarily issued in roughly the duration it takes to watch a pre-roll ad, the club with the widest and most ruthless gulf between the time and air he requires, and the time and air he is likely to receive.

We saw a case of this over the international break, when a viral infographic conveniently informed us that Sesko had been deemed – decisively – the worst signing of the summer transfer window by a survey of football representatives. Naturally, the press are not alone in such behavior. Team social media, online personalities, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of fake followers: all parties with skin in the game is now basically operating along the identical rules, an ecosystem deliberately geared for provocation.

The Mental Cost

Endless scrolling and tapping. What is happening to ourselves? Are we aware, on any level, what this endless sluice of aggravation is doing to our minds? Quite apart from the essential weirdness of being a player in the center of it all, knowing on a bizarre butterfly-effect level that every single thing about players is now basically content, commodity, open-source property to be packaged and traded.

Indeed, partly this is because United are United, the corpse that keeps nourishing the narrative, a big club that must always be generating the strong emotions. But also, in part this is a temporary malaise, a pendulum of judgment most visibly and harshly observed at this time of year, roughly four weeks after the transfer market shut. Throughout the summer we have been desiring footballers, praising them, salivating over them. Yet, just a few weeks in, a lot of those same players are already being dismissed as broken goods. Should we start to be concerned about Jamie Gittens? Was Arsenal's purchase of their striker necessary? What was the purpose of another expensive buy?

The Bigger Picture

It feels appropriate that he meets Liverpool on the weekend: a team simultaneously on a long unbeaten run at their stadium in the Premier League and yet in their own situation of feverish crisis, like filing a a report on a person who popped to the shops half an hour ago. Too open. Mohamed Salah past his prime. The striker waste of money. Arne Slot bald.

Maybe we have failed to understand the way the storyline of football has begun to supplant football the actual game, to inflect the way we view it, an entire sport reoriented around talking points and reaction, an activity that happens in the background while we scroll through our devices, unable to disconnect from the constant flow of opinions and further hot takes. It may be Sesko taking the hit at present. However, we're all losing something here.